|
BY NURIT PELED-ELHANAN
Originally published in the
Jerusalem Post as a 'counterpoint' to Frimet Roth's
article
"The Sin of Forgiveness Fervor". For that reason only, it is reprinted here.
To place the matter beyond doubt, Peled-Elhanan's viewpoint is one
which the management team at the Malki Foundation regards as
abhorrent.
Nov. 27, 2002
I belong to a group of bereaved parents, both Israeli and
Palestinian. This group, The Parents Circle Family Forum, does not
represent anyone except its members, who strongly believe that we
have been made to pay the highest price for a war that should have
ended long ago, by letting careless, ruthless and cynical
politicians use the lives of our children as chips in their deadly
games, turning our children's blood into the cheapest merchandise in
the political market.
That is why we wish to strengthen the voice of parents. We believe
that motherhood, fatherhood and the wish to save the children who
are still alive are only the common denominators that overcome
nationality, race and religion.
Some of us are, indeed, religious. Yitzhak Frankenthal, the founder
of this forum, is an Orthodox Jew, but his Judaism, unlike the
Judaism of some of his friends, who refuse to pray with him when he
says Kaddish for his murdered son, is a source of hope, of peace, of
respect for the other, and therefore of dialogue.
The main activity of our forum is talk. We talk to each other, we
talk to the world, and we talk to young people who are about to join
the army.
We know that conversation is always about differences: It is the
site where differences of power, of knowledge and of beliefs are
constantly negotiated.
People who do not accept differences and are not ready to make room
in themselves for different kinds of knowledge and values cannot
speak to each other. They can trick and deceive and humiliate each
other, but they cannot converse. People who cannot, or will not,
accept differences and who don't see heterogeneity as a blessing,
have a monolithic approach to talking: namely, they want to impose
their ideologies on others and dominate their thinking.
Their speech is intolerant and offensive; it is the kind of approach
we have been witnessing in most of the peace negotiations between
Israelis and Palestinians.
Having a dialogic approach to conversation means being willing to
hold back your ideologies, or your truth, or your personal and
national narrative, and make room in yourself for the truth and the
narrative of the other.
Dialogic people do not believe in fixed personalities, consolidated
thought or eternal realities. In fact, in Hebrew the terms finding,
reality and invention all have the same root. It means that reality
is what we invent; reality is the means we find to give meaning to
what is going on around us, and therefore it can be changed.
Fortunately there are people, even in Israel and Palestine, who are
willing to talk to each other. Unfortunately, they are not many.
Consequently the discourse that prevails in this country is
extremely monologic, racist and aggressive, as evidenced by Frimet
Roth's article.
The annihilation, the demonization of the other has never been a
very promising basis for dialogue.
Our children kill other children because they are brought up on
concepts of discrimination between blood and blood and on the belief
that we are more deserving than others. Our children die because the
voice of mothers and fathers has been suffocated and underrated for
centuries, and because it is always replaced by the voices of
corrupt politicians and bloodthirsty generals, of greedy businessmen
and unscrupulous, so-called leaders who are, most of them, men, but
who never speak as parents.
AFTER MY daughter, Smadari, was murdered for being an Israeli girl
by a young man desperate and distorted by humiliation and
hopelessness to the point of killing himself and others, just
because he was a Palestinian, I was asked by a reporter how I could
accept condolences from the other side.
My very spontaneous response was that I did not accept condolences
from the other side, and when the mayor of Jerusalem came to offer
his condolences I shut myself in my room.
Because the people I count as "my side" are not defined by any
religious or national criteria.
When I say "we," I do not necessarily mean the Jews or the Israelis.
I mean the people who see life as I see it. When I say "we," I mean
my Israeli friends who swore before the open graves of their sons
that although they had lost their children, they would never lose
their heads.
I mean Prof. Gazawi from from Bir Zeit University, my co-laureate of
the Sakharov award who, after being confined in a solitary cell for
his wish to be a free and dignified man in his homeland, after
seeing his 15-year-old son shot in his schoolyard while helping a
wounded friend, still refuses to think of man as evil, and says we
must create the myth of hope for those who have none.
I mean the young Palestinian mother, Najakh, who traveled with me to
New York in order to speak of peace after watching her 10-year-old
son being shot, and who had nothing but affection for my 10-year-old
son.
I mean Khaled, a Palestinian school principal who found his eldest
son with 50 bullets in his body without ever being told why or how,
and who, 20 days after that, called his wife and told her to stop
crying for her child and start crying for mine.
I mean all the parents in the world who would not dream of avenging
the death of their children by killing the children of others.
TODAY, WHEN "terror" is the term coined to define the murderous
deeds of the poor and the weak and "war against terror" is the term
coined to define the murderous deeds of the strong and the rich,
when the greatest democracies commit the most terrible crimes
against humanity using terms such as "freedom," "justice" and "the
clash of civilizations" to justify their crimes, we the bereaved,
the victims of either terror or anti-terror terrorism, are the only
ones left to tell the world that there is no civilized killing of
the innocent or barbaric killing of the innocent, there is only
criminal killing of the innocent.
We are the ones to tell the world there is no clash of
civilizations, that in the ever-growing underground kingdom of dead
children there is no clash of civilizations. On the contrary: True
multiculturalism prevails there, true equality and true justice. And
maybe we are the ones who should remind the world that the golden
age of both Islam and Judaism was when the two lived side by side,
nurturing each other and flourishing together.
We are the ones who travel from one country to another to remind the
world that the death of a child, any child, in Palestine or Israel,
in Afghanistan or Chechnya, is the death of the whole world; that
after the death of a child, any child, there is no other, that no
one can avenge the blood of a child because the child takes into her
small grave, with her small bones, the past and the future, the
reasons for the war and its consequences.
We are the ones who keep telling the world that the only way for
humanity to prevail is to join us in raising this ancient voice,
that has always been there, the voice of motherhood and fatherhood,
raise it until it deafens all the other voices.
We demand that the world redefine its values and priorities,
redefine crime, guilt, the rights of children and the duties of
adults and therefore redefine education and justice, and make it
very clear that anyone who kills a child will never be able to live
in peace in this world. Not even as Cain.
We are the ones who know that if we don't raise this voice very soon
there will be nothing left to say or write or hear except for the
perpetual cry of mourning and the silenced voices of dead children.
Therefore we are the ones who would end the war, because we know
that it doesn't matter what flag is put on what mountain, it doesn't
matter who looks where when they pray, and that nothing is more
important than to secure a young girl's way to her dance class.
That is because we are the ones who realize, every hour of every
day, that as parents and as adults we have betrayed our children by
not being alert, by not fighting for their lives as vigorously as we
should have done, by having promised them a good life and a better
world.
We are the ones who cried, like the Russian poet Anna Akhmatova,
when we saw our little girl or little boy for the last time before
turning our backs and leaving them in the hands of strangers: "Why
does that streak of blood rip the petal of your cheek?"
The writer is a member of The
Parents Circle Family Forum of Israeli and Palestinian bereaved
parents for peace.
|